Most big prop firms are real companies, and many pay traders. But the product is not what a lot of people think. You pay for an evaluation on a simulated account, and the payouts are rewards that the firm decides on under its own terms. Whether a firm is worth trusting comes down to its rules, its track record and what it publishes, not to the label "prop firm".
What you are actually buying
The firms say it plainly in their own terms:
- FTMO: any account it provides is "an account with fully fictitious funds", and clients "never actually perform any trades on live markets".
- Topstep: trades in a simulated account "are not made in live markets", and Topstep says it is not a broker-dealer.
- Apex Trader Funding: "All accounts operate in a simulated environment using virtual funds" and "No real money is deposited or invested".
- FundedNext: activity takes place "exclusively in a simulated environment, for evaluation and training purposes".
- The5ers: the evaluation balance "is fictitious" and the company "is not a broker".
Some firms do move selected traders to real accounts. Apex says it may move a trader out of the simulated environment at its discretion. Lucid Trading says traders can take up to five payouts from each LucidFlex account, "after which they will be moved live".
Are prop firms regulated?
As a rule, no. They are not licensed as investment firms for this product, and regulators have started to comment:
- Czech Republic, where FTMO is based: in an opinion published in September 2023, the Czech National Bank said simulated trading with fictitious funds on a demo account is not an investment service and needs no licence. It added an exception that fits the prop-firm model: if the reward depends on demo results, the arrangement has to be assessed under the rules for financial derivatives. In 2024, Finance Magnates reported the Czech regulator saying prop firms may be subject to EU investment rules (MiFID).
- Belgium: in March 2024 the FSMA warned consumers about prop firms. It said they hold no authorisation to provide investment services and that they earn money from traders who pay for challenges and never pass.
- Italy: in July 2024, Consob said the challenge "is designed so that it is not easily passed". It also said reports it received described no financial benefit being paid.
- United States: FTMO's US offering, run with OANDA, states that "None of the services offered is subject to oversight by any financial regulator." Finance Magnates reported in May 2026 that the CFTC had not made an official statement on the legality of prop firms, and that some US firms were moving into regulated structures.
Firms that shut down or stopped paying
Since 2023 several well-known firms have stopped operating. Most of these accounts come from news reports, not court rulings:
- My Forex Funds: the CFTC charged its parent, Traders Global Group, with fraud in September 2023. It alleged that more than 135,000 customers had paid $310 million in fees. In May 2025 a federal judge dismissed the case with prejudice and sanctioned the CFTC. In July 2025 the agency was ordered to pay more than $3.1 million in legal fees, according to Law360 and Reuters. The My Forex Funds site now announces a relaunch on November 23, 2026, run by a Dubai company.
- True Forex Funds stopped operating in February 2024 after losing its MetaTrader access. It closed for good in May 2024, citing insolvency and saying it could not process pending payouts.
- The Funded Trader suspended payouts in March 2024 for an internal audit, then paused all operations amid payout-denial complaints.
- SurgeTrader ceased operations in May 2024 after its platform licence was terminated.
- Seacrest Funded (formerly MyFundedFX) closed its prop accounts in February 2026 and offered fee refunds and final payouts.
- FundingTicks announced a full wind-down in January 2026, a month after a rule change that traders said was applied retroactively. A press release in its name later said all eligible users were refunded and paid.
Where does payout money come from?
No firm we checked says. Their terms describe payouts as discretionary rewards based on simulated results. Apex says payouts are made "at the sole discretion of Apex". FundedNext says it may "review, adjust, withhold, deny or reverse" rewards before they are paid. Belgium's FSMA says the firms earn money from traders who pay and never pass.
The numbers that are public point the same way:
- FunderPro publishes that 7.35% of buyers pass its evaluation.
- Earn2Trade publishes that 8.89% of candidates passed in 2025, and that about 18% of its live and live-sim accounts had at least one withdrawal.
- Data from FPFX Tech, a technology provider, covered more than 300,000 accounts at ten firms. In that 2024 data set, 14% passed and about 7% of traders received a payout.
How to check a firm before you pay
- Read the payout denial clauses. Topstep can remove simulated profits or ban a user. The5ers denies pending payouts if you do not schedule and complete its interview within five business days. Every firm has clauses like these; know them before you trade.
- Check the company. Look the firm up in its country's company register. For example, UK Companies House lists Alpha Futures Limited as an IT services company, not a regulated financial firm.
- Look for published pass and payout data. Firms that publish it give you something to judge them on. Self-reported "total paid out" figures are not audited.
- Check how long it has existed, and whether it has changed rules on existing accounts. That kind of change came just before the FundingTicks wind-down.
- Read review sites critically. Trustpilot currently shows a guidelines-breach warning on several prop firm profiles and has removed fake reviews. Each of our reviews notes this where it applies.
- Only spend what you can lose. The evaluation fee is the price of the attempt, and most attempts fail. See our risks page.
The bottom line
A prop firm sells a paid trading test with a chance of rewards. That is different from a job offer or a real trading account. Firms that publish their numbers show that a minority of traders do get paid. But the rules decide everything, and the firm writes them. Compare the rules side by side in our comparison table before you buy.
Sources
Checked October 19, 2026. Items marked (news) come from news reports rather than the firm or a regulator.
- FTMO: how an FTMO account works
- Topstep terms of use
- Apex Trader Funding terms of use
- FundedNext terms of service
- The5ers terms and conditions
- Apex live prop trading FAQ
- Lucid Trading: LucidFlex payouts
- Czech National Bank opinion RS2023-18
- FSMA (Belgium) warning, March 2024
- Consob (Italy) notice, July 2024
- Finance Magnates on the Czech regulator, 2024 (news)
- FTMO US (OANDA): rewards account
- Finance Magnates, May 2026 (news)
- CFTC press release 8771-23
- King & Spalding on the May 2025 dismissal (news)
- Law360, July 2025 (news)
- myforexfunds.com
- True Forex Funds, February 2024 (news) and closure, May 2024 (news)
- The Funded Trader pauses operations (news)
- SurgeTrader shuts down (news)
- Seacrest ends prop trading (news)
- FundingTicks press release, January 2026
- FunderPro homepage (pass-rate disclosure)
- Earn2Trade homepage (2025 statistics)
- FPFX Tech data via Finance Magnates (news)
- UK Companies House: Alpha Futures Limited